Repository navigation
8353655: Clean up and open source KeyEvent related tests (Part 1) - #24609
azuev-java wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Clean up and open source three tests related to the KeyEvent mechanics.
|
👋 Welcome back kizune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@azuev-java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 457 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@azuev-java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
| .build() | ||
| .awaitAndCheck(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blank line after this ?
| /* | ||
| * @test | ||
| * @bug 4308606 | ||
| * @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| * @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work | |
| * @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work |
| case KeyEvent.KEY_TYPED: | ||
| str = "KEY_TYPED"; | ||
| break; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
printKey is not invoked from keyTyped method and this case statement won't be reachable. Can be removed safely.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| protected void printKey(KeyEvent evt) { | ||
| switch(evt.getID()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| switch(evt.getID()) { | |
| switch (evt.getID()) { |
Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turbanoff@gmail.com>
|
/integrate |
|
@azuev-java This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration. |
|
@azuev-java This PR is not integrated but the JBS issue is closed now. |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit ad7c475.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@azuev-java Pushed as commit ad7c475. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Clean up and open source three tests related to the KeyEvent mechanics.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24609/head:pull/24609$ git checkout pull/24609Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24609$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24609/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24609View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24609Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24609.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment